What are the issues in evaluating PhD thesis?
1. Format
2. Basic technical error i.e. typing, etc.
3. Clear objectives, experimental design, methodology, discussion towards conclusion.
4. Examiners cannot be the supervisor. Examiners evaluate thesis based on the presentation in the thesis by the candidates. Candidates have to show that they understand what they presented in the thesis.
5. Regulation must be followed by the students and the authority before thesis reach the examiners. The examiners may need to evaluate the thesis content
NOT the technical errors such as typing errors, language, general format, references, etc
* Dipetik dari blog seorang cendekiawan terbilang...
p/s : Itulah adat dunia......tak semua yg ada PHD tuh benar2 telus membawa title 'Dr' yg disandang tuh. Tak dapat dinafikan kdg2 dapat PHD sbb nasib baik.....~takpelah....rezeki msg2~ mcm2 cara org bo dpt PHD...tp yg tak tahannya tuh, kalau meeting asyik nk betulkan grammar je...ada koma ke tidak, ada titik ke tidak, huruf besar kecik...alahai....tu kan 'typist' bo tolong kita check nnt......tak bo ke PHD tuh digunakan untuk pikir ttg sesuatu yg lebih HEBAT? like : content, ideas, hala tuju, vision, mission......etc.... ~"ooooooo....i have no idea what is that...it's NOT MY FIELD~ Gue : PITAM***~
In a real world today, i've seen people being so arrogant with their PHD title until they forget to be realistic. They become selfish, thinking that they are so clever....~ forget that ALLAH Maha Bijaksana~ rasa diri tuh hebat dalam bidang tertentu, lupa padahal hidup ini terlalu indah untuk ditelaah....tidak perlu memandang rendah ~ seorang tukang sapu pun mungkin lebih hebat idea dan pemikirannya tentang sesuatu perkara....yg kita tidak tahu langsung...kerna sesungguhnya Allah menciptakan manusia itu saling memerlukan....lebih banyak yg kita tahu....lebih banyak yang kita perlu pelajari......but better be 'DONE' people than having a PHD with NOTHING......Wallahuaklam..
Pehal yg ko merepek neh ziey? Ko ada PHD ke? Wakakakakkaaa......
